Thursday 21 July 2016

#UPON THE #FUTURE #CLOSER #INTEGRATION OF THE #EU AND THE #POSSIBLE #FUTURE STATE OF THE #MEMBER NATIONS

Thus saith the Lord God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob

    Thus say I unto thee as concerning the EU and what it terms as closer integration, the question must be ask how much closer? Closer to the extent of there being just one parliament and one government one president and one prime minister one central budget for the whole of the EU membership and in future will it be even called or known as the EU?

    What will be the capital city of Europe be, oh Brussels. But what about the member Nations will they even be Nations and not just European provinces and no longer having their own governments and prime minister's or presidents but provincial governors appointed by Brussels or locally elected as is a local mayor or as the US state Governors? Will each province be known by their National name or such as the province or state of France, Germany, Italy, Austria and so on?

    One currency one capital one Nation if you will be able to call it that one Prime minister one President abolition of rotational presidency all National borders governments sovereignty control over local judicial systems and budgets all prime ministers all presidents and National identity gone, except one in Brussels Capital City! One Judiciary system one police force one Army Air force and Navy this is in fact where closer integration leads when it reaches its ultimate conclusion. But what about any member state or Nation leaving the EU, when closer integration really gets underway? It will be very difficult at least almost impossible as every part of the member’s National structure and economy will be so integrated that it will amount to political and economical suicide to even try to leave a closer integrated EU. Also would it be the EU then or the Belgian Republic or even Empire?

    Thus also the question must be asked what the UK has just avoided being involved in for when the EU started upon the path of closer integration it would have required the UK to either join them or leave and as Britain had been excluded from closer integration Britain would have opted to leave or would it. But when that would have come about what would have been Britain’s economical state as the EU wanted and would have gained the movement of the financial capital of Europe and possibly of the World from London to Europe preferably Brussels. Which would mean Britain’s stand as a leading world economy and London’s position of the financial capital of the world would have been lost. In other words Britain could have been classed then as a second rate Nation. Also the question must be asked what its standing then would have been in as far as a World power to be reckoned with. Also would it have been able to maintain its membership of N.A.T.O? But this now will never come about but has to be appreciated that when Britain reached this crossroad it chose the right path to walk upon.

This is the Word of the Lord to thee.

From the prophet of the Lord

No comments:

Post a Comment