Thus saith the Lord God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob
THE CARELESS AND SELFISH ACCTIONS OF A MEMBER OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT THAT PUT HIS FAMILY AND OTHERS AT RISK OF BEING INFECTED BY THE COVID 19 VIRUS
Though it is right and proper for any parent to seek to safeguard their children in any way they can under the present circumstances it is improper to put their children themselves and others at risk by travelling further than is necessary especially when there is evidence that the parents of such children are in fact themselves suffering from the virus as was the cast with the Prime Minister who upon suffering from suspected symptoms of the Covid 19 virus immediately quarantined himself from all contact with others especially his partner who was pregnant at that time of which if he instead had gone to be near his partner and quarantine himself at her accommodation would not only have put his partner at risk but also his unborn child which in the end proved that he did the right thing. But his adviser who was suspected of having the virus not only put himself and his family at risk but others who he came into contact with during and at the end of his journey the right thing for him to do was to immediately quarantine himself in accommodation isolated from all contact with his family as did the Prime Minister.
HIS BOUND DUTY AS A MEMBER OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT WAS TO STRICTLY ADHERE TO THE GOVERNMENT GUIDE LINES FOR THOSE SUSPECTED OF HAVING THE VIRUS AS HAVE THE BRITISH PUBLIC HAVE HAD TO DO SO FOR THE SAFETY OF OTHERS AND THEIR FAMILIES AND FOR HIM BY HIS ACTIONS TO BRING INTO QUESTION THE GOVERNMENT’S COMMITMENT IN SEEKING TO DEAL EFFECTIVELY WITH THE COVID 19 VIRUS PANDEMIC SHOULD RESULT IN SEVERE ACTIONS BEING TAKEN TO PROTECT TO THE GOVERNMENTS REPUTATION. PLUS ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE GOVERNMENT DOING AS HE DID WOULD HAVE RESULTED IN THEIR BEING ASK FOR THEIR RESIGNATION AND UPON REFUSING TO DO SO WOULD HAVE BEEN SACKED. THE BRITISH CONFIDENCE IN THIS GOVERNMENT BY THE ACTIONS OF THIS PERSON IF ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH IT WILL MOST SEVERELY SUFFER AND COULD IN THE FUTURE AFFECT THE PUBLIC’S CONFIDENCE IN THIS CONSERVATIVE PARTY TO GOVERN THE UK AS IT SHOULD BE FAVOURITISM IN GOVERNMENT LEADS TO A FALL IN OTHER WORDS IT IS SHOULD BE WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER.
THIS IS NOT A QUESTION OF LEGALITY BUT OF MORALITY. WAS HE TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE PRESENT PANDEMIC CIRCUMSTANCES WAS HE MORALY RIGHT IN WHAT HE DID?
This is the Word of God to thee
From the prophet of the Lord
THE CARELESS AND SELFISH ACCTIONS OF A MEMBER OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT THAT PUT HIS FAMILY AND OTHERS AT RISK OF BEING INFECTED BY THE COVID 19 VIRUS
Though it is right and proper for any parent to seek to safeguard their children in any way they can under the present circumstances it is improper to put their children themselves and others at risk by travelling further than is necessary especially when there is evidence that the parents of such children are in fact themselves suffering from the virus as was the cast with the Prime Minister who upon suffering from suspected symptoms of the Covid 19 virus immediately quarantined himself from all contact with others especially his partner who was pregnant at that time of which if he instead had gone to be near his partner and quarantine himself at her accommodation would not only have put his partner at risk but also his unborn child which in the end proved that he did the right thing. But his adviser who was suspected of having the virus not only put himself and his family at risk but others who he came into contact with during and at the end of his journey the right thing for him to do was to immediately quarantine himself in accommodation isolated from all contact with his family as did the Prime Minister.
HIS BOUND DUTY AS A MEMBER OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT WAS TO STRICTLY ADHERE TO THE GOVERNMENT GUIDE LINES FOR THOSE SUSPECTED OF HAVING THE VIRUS AS HAVE THE BRITISH PUBLIC HAVE HAD TO DO SO FOR THE SAFETY OF OTHERS AND THEIR FAMILIES AND FOR HIM BY HIS ACTIONS TO BRING INTO QUESTION THE GOVERNMENT’S COMMITMENT IN SEEKING TO DEAL EFFECTIVELY WITH THE COVID 19 VIRUS PANDEMIC SHOULD RESULT IN SEVERE ACTIONS BEING TAKEN TO PROTECT TO THE GOVERNMENTS REPUTATION. PLUS ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE GOVERNMENT DOING AS HE DID WOULD HAVE RESULTED IN THEIR BEING ASK FOR THEIR RESIGNATION AND UPON REFUSING TO DO SO WOULD HAVE BEEN SACKED. THE BRITISH CONFIDENCE IN THIS GOVERNMENT BY THE ACTIONS OF THIS PERSON IF ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH IT WILL MOST SEVERELY SUFFER AND COULD IN THE FUTURE AFFECT THE PUBLIC’S CONFIDENCE IN THIS CONSERVATIVE PARTY TO GOVERN THE UK AS IT SHOULD BE FAVOURITISM IN GOVERNMENT LEADS TO A FALL IN OTHER WORDS IT IS SHOULD BE WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER.
THIS IS NOT A QUESTION OF LEGALITY BUT OF MORALITY. WAS HE TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE PRESENT PANDEMIC CIRCUMSTANCES WAS HE MORALY RIGHT IN WHAT HE DID?
This is the Word of God to thee
From the prophet of the Lord
No comments:
Post a Comment