Thus saith the Lord God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob
Thus saith the Holy One of Israel even the only true eternal God and redeemer of all of those who come to believe in Me through the shed blood of the only true Eternal Passover Lamb the Messiah which is the only way any of mankind can through Faith be redeemed and become children of the Living God inheritors of the Kingdom of Heaven. Thus say I unto thee at this time in as far as Russia and its government are concerned its ears shall remain deaf unto thee no matter what ye say and do they will claim that they are not guilty of the crimes that Britain hath accused them of and will retaliate to any action taken by the EU in support of the UK in like manner and will until hard hitting sanction are brought to bear continue to do so but if hard hitting sanctions are applied that will escalate their response. Thus it is even if; as they are; were responsible they cannot and will not admit it for if Russia admitted to this chemical nerve agent attack on British soil it would automatically have to admit that it was complicit in the chemical attacks on the Syrian people in collusion with the Syrian Government and its other allies. Which would warrant it having to explain its part in the Syrian civil war in as far as the manufacturing stockpiling and usage of the chemical weapons used in that civil war was concerned being a signatory of the usage of the band chemical weapons convention which bans the use manufacturing and stockpiling of banned chemical weapons, its actions in Syria being an ally and supporter of the Assad regime and partaking and continuing to partake in that civil war of which the Syrian rebels have claimed not only did Assad use chemical weapons on the Syrian rebels but the Russians did as well, but as with the Assad regime until there is irrefutable proof to prove both parties did use them in the Syrian Civil war which still rages on no concrete sustainable charges of the usage and misuse of chemical weapons can be brought against either by a war crimes tribunal . The questions must be asked did it partake in the usage with Syria of dropping chemical weapons on the Syrian rebels and if not why did it not force the Syrian Regime to stop its usage of chemical weapons of which it must have if not sanctioned the use of had knowledge of and was aware of their use by the Syrian regime and if aware by their silence are complicity in the usage thereof, but still as said concrete irrefutable proof of the guilt of both parties in the use thereof of chemical weapons usage must be forth coming but the implication both ways are there prove one prove both.
This is the Word of the Lord God unto thee
From the prophet of the Lord
Thus saith the Holy One of Israel even the only true eternal God and redeemer of all of those who come to believe in Me through the shed blood of the only true Eternal Passover Lamb the Messiah which is the only way any of mankind can through Faith be redeemed and become children of the Living God inheritors of the Kingdom of Heaven. Thus say I unto thee at this time in as far as Russia and its government are concerned its ears shall remain deaf unto thee no matter what ye say and do they will claim that they are not guilty of the crimes that Britain hath accused them of and will retaliate to any action taken by the EU in support of the UK in like manner and will until hard hitting sanction are brought to bear continue to do so but if hard hitting sanctions are applied that will escalate their response. Thus it is even if; as they are; were responsible they cannot and will not admit it for if Russia admitted to this chemical nerve agent attack on British soil it would automatically have to admit that it was complicit in the chemical attacks on the Syrian people in collusion with the Syrian Government and its other allies. Which would warrant it having to explain its part in the Syrian civil war in as far as the manufacturing stockpiling and usage of the chemical weapons used in that civil war was concerned being a signatory of the usage of the band chemical weapons convention which bans the use manufacturing and stockpiling of banned chemical weapons, its actions in Syria being an ally and supporter of the Assad regime and partaking and continuing to partake in that civil war of which the Syrian rebels have claimed not only did Assad use chemical weapons on the Syrian rebels but the Russians did as well, but as with the Assad regime until there is irrefutable proof to prove both parties did use them in the Syrian Civil war which still rages on no concrete sustainable charges of the usage and misuse of chemical weapons can be brought against either by a war crimes tribunal . The questions must be asked did it partake in the usage with Syria of dropping chemical weapons on the Syrian rebels and if not why did it not force the Syrian Regime to stop its usage of chemical weapons of which it must have if not sanctioned the use of had knowledge of and was aware of their use by the Syrian regime and if aware by their silence are complicity in the usage thereof, but still as said concrete irrefutable proof of the guilt of both parties in the use thereof of chemical weapons usage must be forth coming but the implication both ways are there prove one prove both.
This is the Word of the Lord God unto thee
From the prophet of the Lord
No comments:
Post a Comment