Thus saith the Lord God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob
By the deputy president of supreme court expressing her opinion in as far as the Governments appeal against the high court’s ruling on the legallity of the Governments position on applying article fifty which is to take place before the supreme court, being one of the Judges to hear the governments appeal she has thus prejudiced herself by her remarks against the Government and that should exclude her from being one of the Judges to hear the case when it comes to court. Also her comments upon the legality of the referendum is amiss as then when it was put before parliament and following an agreement by both Houses on the text of the Bill put before them was passed by both houses of Parliament and after it received Royal Assent on 17 December was made an act of Parliament(law). The Bill is now an Act of Parliament (law). If the referendum bill is an act of Parliament (Law) then the result of the referendum is legally binding upon parliament on behalf of the British people to act upon the result of the referendum and execute article fifty as soon as it possibly can after full consultation with all of the parties of both houses on how and when to proceed and to come to a speedy conclusion on the making of that decision and then to direct the party in power to act upon that decision. Therefore if it is legal and binding by royal assent and an act of parliament making it Law then in fact the courts have no say in the matter except in as far as making sure that the due process of Law is followed to the letter. Thus this means that it is up to both houses of Parliament on how to proceed to enact the wishes of the people of the UK and not just one party even if is the Governing party of the UK it was given by royal assent and passed by both houses not just one party and is a matter of Law not party politics. It is a matter for parliament to act on behalf of the people without the courts interference. As it is a matter of law Parliament by law has to have full control of the matter in hand in as far as the referendum is concerned.
This is the Word of the Lord to thee.
From the prophet of the Lord.
By the deputy president of supreme court expressing her opinion in as far as the Governments appeal against the high court’s ruling on the legallity of the Governments position on applying article fifty which is to take place before the supreme court, being one of the Judges to hear the governments appeal she has thus prejudiced herself by her remarks against the Government and that should exclude her from being one of the Judges to hear the case when it comes to court. Also her comments upon the legality of the referendum is amiss as then when it was put before parliament and following an agreement by both Houses on the text of the Bill put before them was passed by both houses of Parliament and after it received Royal Assent on 17 December was made an act of Parliament(law). The Bill is now an Act of Parliament (law). If the referendum bill is an act of Parliament (Law) then the result of the referendum is legally binding upon parliament on behalf of the British people to act upon the result of the referendum and execute article fifty as soon as it possibly can after full consultation with all of the parties of both houses on how and when to proceed and to come to a speedy conclusion on the making of that decision and then to direct the party in power to act upon that decision. Therefore if it is legal and binding by royal assent and an act of parliament making it Law then in fact the courts have no say in the matter except in as far as making sure that the due process of Law is followed to the letter. Thus this means that it is up to both houses of Parliament on how to proceed to enact the wishes of the people of the UK and not just one party even if is the Governing party of the UK it was given by royal assent and passed by both houses not just one party and is a matter of Law not party politics. It is a matter for parliament to act on behalf of the people without the courts interference. As it is a matter of law Parliament by law has to have full control of the matter in hand in as far as the referendum is concerned.
This is the Word of the Lord to thee.
From the prophet of the Lord.
No comments:
Post a Comment