#THE #POSITION AND THE #ATTITUDE OF THE #EU IN #RELATIONSHIP TO #BRITAIN AND ITS #GOVERNMENT OVER THE #REFURENDUM

Thus saith the Lord God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob.


    Thus say I unto thee there is an option that could be put to the EU, if Britain does leave it will be mainly because of its refusal to reform thus if Britain did vote to leave and the EU did decide that it was in its best interest to reform its whole structure Britain would under those circumstances be willing to rejoin.


    If the EU states that there is no chance at a later date to rejoin if it does reform, then it would be not in their best interest  not to let Britain rejoin and cannot be foreseen to be the attitude of the EU. But also if that was the case then what they have said thus far about Britain’s membership and their fear of Britain leaving and their desire for Britain to remain is false. Thus far they have virtual said they would do anything and go to any extent to keep Britain in the EU, then why have they refused to reform the EU if that will see Britain remaining in the EU? Thus say I that is a conflict of interest. Britain has said the EU needs reformation the EU refused to reform in the way Britain said it needed to, but the EU still refused to reform but has compromised in that it has given Britain a special position within the EU and opt outs that so far have not been fully ratified legally but will be if Britain votes to stay in the EU after the referendum. Britain's negotiation for reform was not just for Britain but for the whole of the EU. Why then has Britain accepted this compromise when it only benefits Britain and not the whole of the EU? Has Britain suddenly become a selfish Nation considering its own interest's above that of the other members of the EU. When in fact Britain is known as a nation which considers the needs of others more important than its own?


    Thus it is if the EU is not willing to reform and not even consider reformation for its own good and to keep Britain in, then Britain should not be willing to stay in the EU without reformation. The point is it was not willing to even consider reformation rejecting it outright and thus it should have been that in those negotiations Britain as was declared by thy leader should not have even considered staying in the EU but should have declared that if their position was an immovable one so should Britain’s and should have be told as thy leader declared, that Britain was leaving the EU.


    One thing remains now that if Britain does vote to stay in the EU as was a fore said then the EU will consider it weak, willed, vulnerable and able to be manipulated as they see fit. In the past other leaders have been strong and firm in their negotiations with the EU as was seen in former leaders of thy government. One especial would never have come away from such a negotiation without a positive result in Britain’s and the other members favour.


    Their attitude to the present leadership is obvious!!!


This is the Word of the Lord to thee.


From the prophet of the Lord.